Tomo Masternode / Community Meeting Notes #1
Sat June 13th, 2020 12:00noon GMT-4 New York (6pm Paris) (12midnight Singapore)
Format: Informal voice conversation
Purpose: To initiate conversation around how Masternode owners and the surrounding community can structure themselves to best serve the Tomochain project. Discussion to center around what we can DO ourselves.
Who: Anyone can listen-in; Masternode owners and Community DO’ers can speak-up
Agenda Items: 1) Purpose (Community vs MN-only Council) 2) Quadratic Voting App 3) Legal Structure (Masternode Council)
Number of Attendees: 7-8 people
Rules of Meeting
- 5 min time limit for speakers w/o an Agenda Item
- Constructive Criticism VS complaining / bashing
- Chatham House Rule: Notes can be taken; Quotes cannot be attributed
Major themes
-
"Masternode" VS “Community” - we originally started this meeting as a pre-cursor to a ‘masternode council’ of some kind, but do we end up closing off participation from others by doing this?
- Anyone can attend these meetings and jump in to help us (two non-masternode-owners attended)
- How can we both support the validation structure (masternodes) and a wider-communal effort?
- Idea: Started by masternodes, influenceable by anyone
-
Structure of Organization - If we create some kind of org that can enact and do things, how do we structure it?
- Decentralized vs Centralized flavors
- Quadratic voting might be used (Decentralized)
- A non-profit org could be setup (Centralized)
- Some mix of the two may be needed, as the org will need to interact with traditional entities from the existing world (ex: paying a lawyer; doing taxes). At the same time, how do we push the decentralization tendencies of the network?
- Decentralized vs Centralized flavors
-
Scope Determination is Important - Does this org simply make its own dapps and code, or does it effect wider layer-1 chain changes?
- Consensus in the meeting: Start small
- Focus at first on small projects to build the community (governance infrastructure; a dApp
- Build out this organizations structure (legal non-profit status, officers, etc)
-
Dev Fund: 600k TOMO exists in a development fund of sorts; Tomochain Pte. Ltd. holds it for now, but wants to figure out what to do with it going forward
- “Community Ecosystem Fund” as it was referenced in the whitepaper.
- Could consider giving it to an org like this or some other arrangement.
- Came from 10% of rewards accrueing in a special account
To-Do’s
-
Research & propose an initial governance structure
Compare various existing governance and organizational structures/methods. Can we combine both decentralized and centralized components? Come up with initial scope+future scopes. Setup a non-profit?
Examples: Eth foundation, Terra governance is impressive, Compounds governance is neat, Tezos governance claims to be next-level.
-
Determine an initial development effort
Some kind of opinion tallying/deciding method? A way to distribute funds and resources that the org has. Or do we want a pure dApp that we build in order to kick-off dev use on the chain? Like porting an existing eth project.
Governance Infrastructure vs Application-layer… which do we do first?
Next Meeting
- July 11th, 2020
- Meetings once per month